Pros Of Mac Matte Lipstick D for Danger. 1) Good and sturdy packaging. 2) Sweet vanilla scent. 3) Beautiful muted magenta pink color. 4) Does not dry out lips. 5) Soft and buttery texture. 6) Glides on lips effortlessly without pull or tug. 7) Insanely pigmented. 8) Easily available on online retailers as well as MAC Stores. 9) Stays for max 4 to 5 hours.
Application-how did this product apply? glidestugs |
Moisturizing-how moisturizing is this product? hydratingdrying |
Long-Wearing-how long-wearing is this product? stays all daydisappears quickly |
Colour-does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube? |
Pigmentation-how pigmented is this product? |
Luster-how lustrous is this product? |
Buildable-how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product? builds easilyhard to build |
Feathering-how feathering is this product? stays putfeathers or bleeds |
Texture-how is the texture of this product? smoothgritty |
Value-how would you rate the value of this product overall? overdeliveredunderdelivered |
Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: Feedback for the application category the current four is a sign that responses to 'how did this product apply?' generally indicate glides. Considering feedback for the colour category the current rating of six indicates considering the question 'does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?' heavily favor true to colour. Considering the pigmentation category the rating of six suggests reviewers in response to the 'how pigmented is this product?' primarily suggest opaque. Reviewing the luster category a rating of one suggests users & critics evaluating 'how lustrous is this product?' generally suggest matte. Looking at review rankings for the texture category an average total of five suggests replies to 'how is the texture of this product?' frequently lean smooth.
at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.
without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.
as an example, one rating criteria for lipsticks is luster. luster ranges from matte to glossy. Matte might be a desired quality for you, while glossy might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.
an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for luster without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.
we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .